Head to head / Technical comparison
Dimensional Slash Pro versus Freezing
A spec-by-spec look at how these two OGKILS rackets differ.
- highest figure here
- lowest figure here
- not published
| Item name | ||
|---|---|---|
| Classification | ALL-AROUND | ALL-AROUND |
| Materials | High Modulus Carbon Fiber | High Modulus Carbon Fiber |
| Balance ? | Even Balance | Even Balance |
| Stiffness ? | 8.7–9.3 Medium | 8.7–9.3 Medium |
| Balance point ? | 297 mm | 297 mm |
| Weight ? | 80–84.9 g | 80–84.9 g |
| Swing weight ? | — Not published | — Not published |
| Shaft diameter ? | 6.8 mm lowest figure in this row | 7 mm highest figure in this row |
| Max tension ? | 29 lbs | 29 lbs |
| Frame area ? | 359.7 cm² highest figure in this row | 354 cm² lowest figure in this row |
| Grip length | 207 mm highest figure in this row | 202 mm lowest figure in this row |
| Price | ₱2,300 highest figure in this row | ₱2,000 lowest figure in this row |
An arrow marks the extreme value in that row — it is a measurement, not a verdict: heavier, stiffer or thicker is not automatically better, and which end suits you depends on how you play. A row is left unmarked when the values match, when the gap is too small to feel (under 5mm of balance point or 0.2mm of shaft diameter), or when the figure isn't published.
The verdict
The Dimensional Slash Pro and the Freezing are both all-around rackets, so the choice comes down to feel rather than role — balanced and adaptable — a safe default. In the hand, the Dimensional Slash Pro is even-balanced, a neutral feel that neither rushes nor loads the head (balance point 297mm), and the Freezing is even-balanced, a neutral feel that neither rushes nor loads the head (297mm). The Dimensional Slash Pro's shaft reads medium, versus medium on the Freezing — the stiffer of the two rewards a faster, cleaner swing while the softer one adds repulsion and forgiveness. On weight, the Dimensional Slash Pro comes in 4U/5U and the Freezing in 4U/5U; lighter frames move faster in defence, heavier ones put more behind an attack. At ₱2,300 against ₱2,000, the Freezing is the more affordable of the two — worth weighing against the differences above rather than in isolation. If you play a power game, lean toward the more head-heavy, more attack-oriented of the two; if you value speed and control in the flat exchanges, the lighter, more even option will suit you better. Switch the weight class on either column to see how the numbers move before you decide.